tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2009039293365267409.post1994508257652183132..comments2024-02-23T00:28:57.919-08:00Comments on The Great Blog Adventure: Birthmarks & Book Covers: Judging a Book By Its CoverGotta Tell Gailhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02556890642628140871noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2009039293365267409.post-13022297671213300342012-05-09T15:20:17.240-07:002012-05-09T15:20:17.240-07:00It really is a discredit to the story to hide the ...It really is a discredit to the story to hide the meaning on a cover.<br />Glad you kept reading it anyway!<br />But then I guess we sort of do that every day in one way or another.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2009039293365267409.post-70715470371432363702012-05-03T09:35:27.029-07:002012-05-03T09:35:27.029-07:00Thanks for the words of encouragement. I plan to w...Thanks for the words of encouragement. I plan to write the publisher, but this got done first.Gotta Tell Gailhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02556890642628140871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2009039293365267409.post-30592750438094459722012-05-03T09:12:54.357-07:002012-05-03T09:12:54.357-07:00Yes. Yes. Yes. That is why they should never take ...Yes. Yes. Yes. That is why they should never take cover power away from authors. After all, who is the expert here?<br />Sorry to say, it is probably just another sample of our over-marketed world, where a child without a birthmark may "sell better" than one with. I disagree wholeheartedly. As you say, they missed their chance to say so much more.<br />By the way, you've made the point well. The publisher should read it!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com